Those with stakes in IPL cannot fight BCCI polls: Supreme Court

• 
  PTI

  The role of ICC chairman N. Srinivasan's son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan (left) and Rajasthan Royals owner Raj Kundra (right) in betting stands proved, the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday. File photos

N. Srinivasan has to shed his stakes in CSK to be eligible; Court confirms Justice Mudgal panel report finding Gurunath Meiyappan and Raj Kundra guilty of betting

The Supreme Court on Thursday held that the BCCI can hold elections in the next six weeks provided no person holding commercial interests in the Indian Premier League contests.

A Bench of Justices T.S. Thakur and Fakir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, in a detailed judgment in the 2013 IPL betting and spot-fixing case, held that the disqualification of people donning both caps of cricket administrator and IPL team owner will continue until they choose to shed one of them.

This means that N. Srinivasan, who is the Managing Director of India Cements, the company which owns the Chennai Super Kings, has to shed his equity in the CSK to be eligible to contest the BCCI elections.

As a prelude to this direction, the Bench held the February 2008 amendment to rule 6.2.4, which allowed cricket administrators to become team owners, as “void and ineffective”, while observing that the amendment “perpetuates” conflict of interest in the running of the popular game.

It asked whether the BCCI, which it held as conducting a “public function” and amenable to writ jurisdiction, can live with the idea that the game is being played to cheat the public. The court said people will lose interest if it is found that the game is run by a few business interests.

The Bench however gave Mr. Srinivasan a clean chit on allegations made against him that he had misused his official position in the BCCI to cover-up the misdeeds like betting and spot-fixing indulged in by team owners and officials during IPL games.

It said these were mere “suspicions” and “difficult” to prove.

The court further confirmed the Justice Mukul Mudgal probe committee’s findings by holding Mr. Srinivasan's son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan and Raj Kundra, part-owner of Rajasthan Royals IPL team, guilty of betting. It dismissed claims made that Mr. Meiyappan was no team official but a cricket enthusiast. Justice Thakur, who wrote the judgment, said there was enough evidence to prove that Mr. Meiyappan was a team official privy to sensitive information.

The Bench further went on to make franchises — CSK and RR — liable for “misconduct” of Mr. Meiyappan and Mr. Kundra, saying that “misconduct is not only punishable against team officials but also against franchises”.The Bench said it would not be fair to leave the task of deciding the quantum of punishment of CSK, RR, Mr. Meiyappan and Mr. Kundra to either the BCCI or to the apex court itself. So, it ordered the setting up of a three-member high-powered committee led by former Chief Justice of India R.S. Lodha and former Supreme Court judges Ashok Bhan and R.V. Raveendran as members to decide the question of punishment.

It said the committee represented “outstanding judicial minds and men with impeccable credentials” who will give the public confidence in the objectivity and transparency of the inquiry and re-hauling of BCCI structure.

Giving wide powers to the Justice Lodha Committee, the judgment said the committee would further recommend measures to streamline BCCI elections, eligibility of candidates and criteria for disqualification.The committee would further define in detail what amounts to conflict of interest and evolve a mechanism to avoid the situation. It would also carry out the recommendations of the Justice Mudgal Committee and also further probe the role and involvement of IPL COO Sundar Raman. The committee has been given further powers to bring in any recommendations it sees fit in the BCCI functioning. Any decision taken by this committee will be “final and binding on the BCCI”.